The CPOC is seeking community input on a proposed AI-assisted police report writing policy. Share your thoughts and help shape the policy by completing the CPOC community survey on AI-assisted police report writing policy.
La CPOC solicita la opinión de la comunidad sobre una propuesta de política para la redacción de informes policiales con ayuda de la inteligencia artificial. Comparte tu opinión y ayuda a dar forma a la política completando la encuesta comunitaria de la CPOC sobre la política de informes policiales con ayuda de inteligencia artificial.
Purpose
The purpose of the Community Police Oversight Commission is to enhance, develop, and strengthen community-police relations, and review and make recommendations regarding the ongoing operations of the police department to the chief of police, city manager, and/or city council.
CPOC News & Announcements
Meeting Information
Contact Information
Commission Information
| NAME | NOMINATING AUTHORITY | TERM EXPIRES |
|---|---|---|
| Phillip J. Argento | Mayor | 6/30/26 |
| Esprit Loren Jones | District 1 | 6/30/24 |
| Selina Ho | District 2 | 6/30/27 |
| Vacant | District 3 | 6/30/26 |
| Teddy Bedjakian | District 4 | 6/30/27 |
| Raul Ibanez | District 5 | 6/30/26 |
| Paula Verrette, M.D. | District 6 | 6/30/27 |
| Lawrence Lurvey | District 7 | 6/30/26 |
| Latoya Patillo, Chair | Community Based Organization | 6/30/28 |
| Faisal Rashid | Community Based Organization | 6/30/28 |
| Theodore (Ted) Smith | Community Based Organization | 6/30/28 |
The CPOC includes 11 Pasadena residents: one nominated by the Mayor, one by each City Councilmember, and three by community organizations.
Initial Commission members were appointed to staggered terms of one, two, or three years. After these initial terms, all subsequent appointments are for three-year terms. A member may continue to serve until their successor is appointed.
Members who have served two consecutive terms are not eligible for reappointment until a two-year period has passed.
The Rules and Regulations for the Community Police Advisory Commission was approved by the City Council on March 21, 2022, and amended on December 16, 2024, and August 25, 2025.
2025-08-25 CPOC - Updated Rules and RegulationsFurther information about the Commission, including member qualifications, duties, and terms of commissioners, can be found at Pasadena Municipal Code, Chapter 2.60.
Independent Police Auditor
As part of the City's oversight program, the City contracted with an Independent Police Auditor (IPA) Teresa Magula of the OIR Group. The IPA serves as a best practices advisor to the Commission and has unimpeded access to all Police Department personnel complaints and investigations for auditing and reporting purposes, and reviews all categorical uses of force to assess whether the investigation into a use of force was complete, thorough, objective, and fair. Together with the Commission, the IPA recommends changes and additions to department policies, procedures, and officer training.
IPA and CPOC Recommendations Tracker
This tracker and dashboard monitor recommendations made by the Community Police Oversight Commission (CPOC) and the Independent Police Auditor (IPA) to the Pasadena Police Department (PPD).
Both the CPOC and the IPA operate independently from PPD. Their role is to review, analyze, and make recommendations. All recommendations are advisory only. This tracker is intended to help the public understand what recommendations have been made and how the PPD has responded over time.
Please note that some recommendations in this tracker were issued by independent experts before the CPOC and IPA were created. During that period, the City relied on external reviewers to assess critical incidents and the Police Department’s Use of Force policy.
Report a Police Complaint / Compliment
If you believe you have experienced or witnessed misconduct by a Pasadena Police Department (PPD) officer or employee, you have the right to file a complaint.
If you have had a positive experience with a Pasadena Police Department officer or employee, you may submit a compliment.
Your feedback helps identify areas for improvement, acknowledges exceptional service, and supports the Department’s commitment to effective community policing.
Complaints can be submitted directly to the Pasadena Police Department. You may file a complaint:
- Online through the Police Department's website by clicking the button above
- In person at the Pasadena Police Department
- By contacting the Professional Standards Unit at (626) 744-4505
Any member of the public may file a complaint regarding the conduct of a Police Department employee. Complaints may be submitted anonymously.
If you file a complaint in person, you will receive a copy of your signed statement at that time. For complaints submitted through other methods, a copy will be mailed to you.
You can also contact the Community Police Oversight Commission at cpoc@cityofpasadena.net or the Independent Police Auditor at info@OIRGroup.com if you need assistance with this process.
Once your complaint is closed by the Pasadena Police Department (PPD), and if you are dissatisfied with how PPD handled your complaint, you may contact the Community Police Oversight Commission (CPOC) at cpoc@cityofpasadena.net to request a review by the Independent Police Auditor (IPA).
The standard complaint investigation process typically takes PPD between three and six months to complete, but more complex investigations or those requiring various levels of review may take longer. You can check the status of your complaint by contacting the Professional Standards Unit at (626) 744-4505
The IPA will review the Department's handling of the complaint investigation to determine whether it was complete, thorough, and fair. Where appropriate and as permitted by law, the IPA may provide feedback to the PPD, the complainant, and/or the CPOC. The IPA's review does not change the outcome of the complaint investigation but may help identify opportunities to improve investigative practices, policies, procedures, or Department operations.
Key Reports and Additional Information
- 2023-04-06 CPOC Recommendation Regarding the Pointing of a Firearm
- 2023-12-07 CPOC Approved Draft Pretext Stop Methodology
- 2023-12-07 CPOC Recommendation regarding Cellular Site Simulator Policy
- 2025-06-09 CPOC Traffic Stop Recommendations
- 2026-04-22 CPOC Drone Policy Recommendations
- 2026-06-16 CPOC AI Assisted Police Report Writing Policy Recommendations
- 2026-06-16 CPOC Energy Assisted Breaching Policy Recommendations
- 2026-06-18 CPOC Immigration Violations Policy Recommendations
- 2023-05-01 IPA Use of Force Investigation Assessment Report (May 1, 2023)
- 2024-02-16 IPA Memo re: Officer Involved Shooting of Daniel Warren (UOF2019-017)
- 2024-07-08 IPA Assessment of Pasadena Police Dept. Handling of Misconduct Complaints
- 2024-09-30 IPA Memo Re: Officer Involved Shooting of Lloyd Nelson, Jr.
- 2025-01-09 IPA Memo Re: Officer Involved Shooting of Hall (UOF-2021-021)
- 2025-07-02 IPA Memo Re: Officer Involved Shooting of Adam Younies (UOF-2022-016)
- 2025-09-11 IPA Review of Vehicle Pursuit Incidents
- 2026-03-12 IPA Use of Force Review
- 2026-06-11 IPA Review of Complaint Investigations
- 2026-07-09 IPA Review of PPD's Flock Safety ALPR Compliance
- 2026-08-13 IPA Review of Calls with Behavioral Health Component
- 2022-03-31 LA County District Attorney Review of McClain OIS
- 2022-10-25 PPD Finalized Administrative Use of Force Review - Anthony McClain
- 2023-04-17-OIR-Response-Letter-and-Matrix-04172023-2021-hrs
- 2023-04-27-PPD Response Letter and Matrix to IPA UOF Report
- 2024-01-16 Response Letter and FY 2022-23 Work Plan Recommendations
- 2024-02-15 Daniel Warren-PPD OIS Review & LADA OIS Review
- 2024-08-03 PPD Response and Cover Letter to IPA Complaint Handling Assessment
- 2025-09-15 PPD Response Traffic Stop Recommendations
- 2025-09-16 PPD Response to IPA Memo re: officer involved shooting of Adam Youines
- 2025-12-11 PPD Response to Review of Vehicle Pursuit Incidents
- 2026-05-19 PPD Response to IPA Use of Force Review
- 2026-06-16 PPD Response to IPA Review of Complaint Investigations
- 2026-07-09 PPD Response to Drone Policy Recommendations
- 2003-12 Public Opinions of the Police - The Influence of Friends, Family, and News Media
- 2016 Thin Blue Lies How Pretext Stops Undermine Police Legitimacy
- 2020-10-27 LAPD IG Review of LAPD Stops 2019
- 2021-04-16 Cities Looking to Reform Police Traffic Stops
- 2021-06 LAPD Stops - Race and the Perception of Bias
- 2022-10 Racial Disparities in Traffic Stops
- 2022-11-14 LAPD Reduction in Pretext Stops
- 2023 CPE Traffic Safety Recommendations
- 2023-01-01 RIPA Annual Report
- 2023-02-03 Here's How to Reduce Deaths at the Hands of the Police - TIME
- 2023-12 Review of Academic Literature on Pretextual Stops
- 2024 - Racial Disparities In Use Of Force At Traffic Stops - CPE
- 2024 LAPD Policy Study - Criminology & Public Policy
- 2024-01-01 RIPA Annual Report
- 2024-02 Suburban Policing Data Analysis Project Report - LACCHR
- 2024-03 Evidence Supports Limiting Non-Safety-Related Traffic Stops - Vera Institute
- 2024-12-09 Denver Post - DPD policy change leads to reduction in traffic stops
- 2024-LAPD-Policy-Study-Criminology-Public-Policy